Latest posts

Adobe delves deeper in digital workflow

lightroom

Adobe Labs is uncovering the wraps on its latest workflow piece: Project Lightroom. Releasing the program as a public beta through June 2006, the program is first available as a Mac version, with a Windows Beta release soon to follow. What does Lightroom do?

Adobe® Lightroom™ Beta is the efficient new way for professional photographers to import, select, develop, and showcase large volumes of digital images. So you can spend less time sorting and refining photographs, and more time actually shooting them. Its clean, elegant interface literally steps out of the way and lets you quickly view and work with the images you shot today, as well as the thousands of images that you will shoot over the course of your career. Because no two photographers work alike, Adobe Lightroom adapts to your workflow, not the other way around.

In a nutshell, this appears to be a far more powerful, professional and soon-to-be less secular version of Apple’s Aperture software. I feel though that both packages are aiming for the high-end, hard core digital photography afficionados, while most of the tools provided by each package will probably go over the heads of the average end user. For basic needs, Picasa might even do the job.

Amp’d Mobile shakes its junk

ampd mobile

So Amp’d Mobile, the truly amped-up Verizon Wireless reseller that focuses heavily on high-speed data, video, games and graphics, just recently launched early this year with the infamous “shake your junk” commercial. And it appears from day one, Amp’d had a lot of junk to shake out.

Users and resellers are reporting that a majority of Amp’d’s first batch of phones to hit store shelves are defective, some looping in a constant reboot cycle, others not able to access the broadband “Amp’d live” content. Considering the way Amp’d has touted the capabilities of their phones and the content that can be streamed through them, this is definitely not the way to launch a wireless service. Weren’t any of these units tested before they hit the stores?

Why radio is never free

Lately, there’s been an interesting campaign being put forth by the traditional AM and FM radio stations, who are beginning to really feel the heat from the braodcast industry’s newest up and comer, satellite radio.

It started with these little ditties from the National Association of Broadcasters. It’s part of their campaign titled “Radio: You Shouldn’t Have to Pay For It.”

Radio: You shouldn’t Have to pay For it

Baseball Ad (mp3 file)

Heavy Metal (mp3 file)

Leading Man [whatever that means] (mp3 file)

Lewd Act (mp3 file)

You get the idea… if you’re really interested, the entire collection of these oh-so-creative spots can be found on their ad promo page.

Then the campaign expanded to individual radio stations. Have you noticed the stuff coming from local radio stations lately? A lot of them are advertising their “free” status including the former KRock (now “Free FM”) in the New York market… the former home of Howard Stern.

Well, the NAB and terrestrial broadcasters are right about one thing: I shouldn’t have to pay for radio. Unfortunately, I feel that nowadays, I simply have no choice.

I realized this about four years ago, over the course of a week. I realized that for five straight days of commuting back and forth to work, I hadn’t heard a single song on the radio. Not one. instead, I heard commercials. Lots of them. Some of them were repetetive, others completely inane and useless.

Over the past several years, “Free” radio has devolved into a sorry state. Music is getting less air time as up to 30-minute stretches of non-stop commercials rule the air. When music does play, it’s often a repetetive and limited playlist, for the which the on-air talent (if there is any, some stations are DJ-less now) has little leeway to deviate from.

Tired of one station? Well, you can of course fiddle with the controls and find something else. But chances are the format of any other station you find will be similar, possibly even playing the same limited set of songs. Even in the most crowded radio market in the US, 37 radio stations hail, yet they can be lumped into a mere 5 or 6 major formats. WHY?!

Unfortunately, the NAB and its sheep just don’t get it. Yes, about 9 million people in the US currently pay either XM or Sirius for radio. But do they honestly think that people would choose to pay if they didn’t have to? Of course not! These people are fleeing a medium that has become littered with hyperprofit-driven corporate conformity, in exchange for paying for the quality that “free” radio used to have. And I dare say that “free” radio has probably lost those paying customers for good.

On DaimlerChrysler and Fur

The most randomly… interesting graphic is now showing on the Dodge.com website:

caliber

Click on the image , and you’re taken to a promo page for the new Caliber, a crossover vehicle intended to take the place of the now-discontinued Neon.

But the real mystery is: what’s up with the evil furry thing in the graphic that looks like it’s about to eat the car? It shows up nowhere else on the site! Is this velvet oddity intended to match the lunacy of the Evil Bert?

It’s official: fetuses cannot commute

Baby On Board

According to a municipal court judge in Arizona, unborn fetuses do not share the same commuter rights as their born counterparts. So, much to the chagrin of expectant mothers everywhere, they cannot be counted as occupants in HOV Lanes:

Candace Dickinson was fined $367 for improper use of a carpool lane, but contended her unborn child qualified to use the lane. Motorists who use the lanes normally must carry at least one passenger during weekday rush hours.

Municipal Judge Dennis Freeman rejected Dickinson’s argument Tuesday, applying a “common sense” definition in which an individual is someone who occupies a “separate and distinct” space in a vehicle.

“The law is meant to fill empty space in a vehicle,” the judge said.